When a film adaptation (from books) comes out, do you read the book first or watch the movie first? Or just watch it and give a damn about reading? I usually prefer reading beforehand. However I found myself wondering which option will give maximum utility to the beholder after attending the premier of Catching Fire (thanks Sabrina and Xin Wen!) last Wednesday. Post movie marathon, I was aware of my heightened sense of satisfaction, hence I wandered into this question. Of course, I read Catching Fire, from a free online version here.
Thanks to encountering Harry Potter late in life, I have set myself to read books pre-movie. It was a requirement that I unconsciously upheld. My reasons were: a) I do not want my creativity of visualization to be restricted by the fixed play out of the story in the movie b) I feel the need to understand the standpoint of the writer which may be compromised by poor execution of directors/ editing so the movie would "sell" c) To know the development of the original story. Yes, I do enjoy shouting out the results of characters' actions throughout the movie (mainly in my head to avoid malicious repercussions).... BUT since utility is the one in the limelight, shouldn't everything else be dropped?
My opinion: Experiment. Keeping in mind that every movie is subjected to many factors involved, try living both lives and see which one turns out better. There is such a thing as majority. Who knows, you could have the best of both worlds *inserts kitten floating in space with Miley cao-gan face*.
Below is not the outfit I wore to the premier, but what I wore on Sunday.
Gypsy floral chiffon blouse from Miss Selfridge, staple black skinnies from Topshop, ethnic loafers bought from Kenanga Mall.
